Jumaat, 1 April 2011

wow....MARKAH penuh..HAMPIR FULL MARK!!!!!

ALHAMDULILAH u olssssss.......x sia2 adyva bersengkang mata!...tup2 tengok DAPAT MARKAH HAMPIR penuh!....
...meh la tgk detail....lega sgt!,...
terbalas semuanya!...amin ya rabbal alamin!...

GRED PENILAIAN BERTERUSAN BAGI SEMESTER JANUARI 2011
KOD TAJUK KURSUSPENERANGAN
BBHM2203 PENGURUSAN HOTEL
TUGASAN (40%)
37.252 (Markah Terperinci)
BBRM3103 PENGURUSAN BAHAGIAN BILIK PENGINAPAN
TUGASAN (40%)
34 (Markah Terperinci)

nie subjek HOTEL MANAGEMENT~...subjek satu lagi cube tgk yg bawah tu plak~...



STUDENT INFORMATION
Name: MOHD ADI BIN IDRIS
Student ID: 850902016791
Title: JANUARY 2011: BBHM2203 ASSIGNMENT
Due Date: 14 March 2011
Submission Date: 11 March 2011
Submitted right file

MARKING DETAILS
Total Percentage: 93.13 %
Final Mark: 37.25 /40

RUBRIC


Type : BBHM2203 SEM JAN 2011
Category Weightage 0 1 2 3 4 Mark
INTRODUCTION OF THE SELECTED HOTEL.1
NA
Low-The introduction is irrelevant and out of context to the requirement of the assignment.
Fair-Introduction is hazy. Only some are relevant and in the right context to the requirement of the assignment.
Above average-Introduction moderately explained, relevant and in the right context to the requirement of the assignment.
Excellent-Introduction is clearly explained, relevant and in the right context to the requirement of the assignment.
4
Discussion on the sources of reservations.2
NA
low-Shows confusion and unable to provide examples.
Fair-Able to identify sources of reservations but unable to discuss them in detail. Able to provide some examples.
Above average-Able to identify the sources of reservations. Clear, consistent and good discussion on guest reservation and billing system. Able to provide many examples.
Excellent-Able to identify the sources of reservations. Clear, consistent, and excellent discussion on guest reservation, billing system, charges and change room system. Able to provide many examples.
8
EVALUATION OF THE INVENTORY SYSTEM.2.75
NA
Low-Evaluations are not supported by any reasoning and justification.
Fair-Fair evaluations of hotel inventory management system and methods are done but not supported by appropriate reasoning and justification.
Above average-Good evaluations of hotel inventory management system and methods are done and supported by fair reasoning and justification.
Excellent-In depth and excellent evaluations of hotel inventory management system and methods are done and supported by good reasoning and justification.
11
Examination of the security system.2.75
NA
low-Unable to examine the security system. However, a few examples were provided.
Fair-Fair examination of the security system, able to discuss the best practices and basic security requirements of the selected hotel.
Above average-Good examination of the security system, able to discuss and analyse the best practices and basic security requirements of the selected hotel. Able to spell out the OSHA guidelines.
Excellent-Excellent examination of the security system, able to discuss and analyse the best practices and basic security requirements of the selected hotel. Able to relate the OSHA guidelines to the prevention of accidents.
8.25
Recommendations to improve.1.5
NA
Low-Only one feasible recommendation was provided.
Fair-Two feasible recommendations were provided.
Above average-Three feasible recommendations were provided.
Excellent-Four feasible recommendations were provided.
6
TOTAL: 37.25
OVERALL COMMENTS
Excellent write up and able to provide good explanation on case: Thistle Hotel, Johor Bahru.

sekian~....STUDY FoR EXAM!!!!

WOW...markah assingment ADYVA (A) !!!

hye2 semua!......hari nie paling BEST la....
dah bosan on9.....terus double cek MARKAH Assingment dh kuar ke belom!....
tgk2 dapat A.....sumpah xpernah assingment sejak kena submit ONLINE nie dapat A....ada je x kena!..
fuhh~....lega sangat!.......

nie subjek ROOM DIVISION MANAGEMENT

STUDENT INFORMATION
Name: MOHD ADI BIN IDRIS
Student ID: 850902016791
Title: JANUARY 2011: BBRM3103 ASSIGNMENT
Due Date: 14 March 2011
Submission Date: 14 March 2011
Submitted right file

MARKING DETAILS
Total Percentage: 85 %
Final Mark: 34 /40

RUBRIC


Type : BBRM3103 SEM JAN 2011
Category Weightage 0 1 2 3 4 Mark
Introduction0.5
NA
Low-The introduction of the chosen hotel in Malaysia is not provided.
Fair-The introduction of the chosen hotel in Malaysia is explained briefly.
Above average-The introduction of the chosen hotel in Malaysia is discussed relatively clear.
Excellent-The introduction of the chosen hotel in Malaysia is discussed clearly.
2
Organisation of the essay3.5
NA
Low-The organisation of essay is poor. The gap analysis is not conducted and the shortcoming of the room management in the chosen hotel is discussed vaguely. The write-up appear to have no direction, with subtopics appearing disjointed.
Fair-The organisation of essay is relatively clear. The gap analysis is briefly explained and the shortcoming of the room management for he chosen hotel is fairly clear discussed. The write- up is lacking of flow from one section to the next, and the topics seem to be disjointed.
Above average-The organisation of essay is clear. The gap analysis and he shortcoming of the room management for the chosen hotel is discussed relatively clear. The write-up have a basic flow from one section to the next, and most sections or paragraphs follow a natural or logical order.
Excellent-The organisation of essay is clear. The gap analysis and he shortcoming of the room management for the chosen hotel is clearly discussed. The write-up go from general ideas to specific conclusions. Sections and paragraphs flow together smoothly.
10.5
The proposed solutions and supported by past studies.3.5
NA
Low-Fail to provide solutions to the shortcomings of the room management discussed earlier. Did not support the write-up with past studies conducted.
Fair-Briefly discussed on the provided solutions to the shortcomings of the room management discussed earlier. Did not support the write-up with past studies conducted.
Above average-Briefly discussed on the provided solutions to the shortcomings of the room management discussed earlier. Support the write- up with past studies conducted.
Excellent-Discussed clearly on the provided solutions to the shortcomings of the room management discussed earlier. Well supported write-up with past studies conducted.
14
References and citations1
NA
Low-Most of the statements included in the report were not referenced.
Fair-Some citations for statements included in the report or references which were included were not found in text.
Above average-Most citations were included in the report and most references matched with the citations using APA format.
Excellent-All citations were included in the report and references matched with citations using the APA format.
3
Conclusions1.5
NA
Low-Illogical conclusion and views provided.
Fair-Fairly clear and provided reasonably logical conclusion provided.
Above average-Relatively clear and provided reasonably logical provided.
Excellent-Logical and clear conclusion provided. Constructive comments are provided as well.
4.5
TOTAL: 34
OVERALL COMMENTS
Above average and have evidence of critical thinking